Alzanam v. City of Kingston et al
| Dawood Alzanam |
| City of Kingston, City of Kingston Police Department, Travis Wilber and Dylan Joslin-Peter |
| 1:2022cv01017 |
| September 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Christian F Hummel |
| David N Hurd |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Kingston, City of Kingston Police Department, Dylan Joslin-Peter, Travis Wilber. Motion returnable before Judge Hurd Response to Motion due by 11/25/2022. Reply to Response to Motion due by 12/2/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law) (Cook, Michael) |
| Filing 7 COURT NOTICE of Change in Conference Date/time: The Initial Conference has now been reset for Wednesday, 12/7/2022 @ 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. The Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 11/30/2022. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (tab) |
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER approving #5 LETTER BRIEF filed by City of Kingston, Travis Wilber, City of Kingston Police Department, Dylan Joslin-Peter: Answer due date updated for City of Kingston answer due 11/5/2022; City of Kingston Police Department answer due 11/5/2022; Dylan Joslin-Peter answer due 11/5/2022; Travis Wilber answer due 11/5/2022. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 10/6/2022. (tab)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER BRIEF by City of Kingston, City of Kingston Police Department, Dylan Joslin-Peter, Travis Wilber. (Cook, Michael) |
| ***Answer due date updated for Defendants. City of Kingston answer due 10/5/2022; City of Kingston Police Department answer due 10/5/2022; Dylan Joslin-Peter answer due 10/5/2022; Travis Wilber answer due 10/5/2022. (map) |
| Filing 4 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial In-Person Rule 16 Conference set for 11/15/2022 at 10:00 AM in Albany before U.S. Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 11/8/2022. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (map) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMISSION REQUIREMENT as to Plaintiff's Counsel Nicolas Bagley, Esq. and Charles E. Green, Esq. Email addresses served at: nbagley@friedmanlevy.com and cgreen@friedmanlevy.com. Clerk served Notice of Attorney Admission Requirement along with a courtesy copy of the General Order 25. Listed firm phone number is: (212) 307-5800. Admissions due by 10/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Attorney Admission Requirement: Charles E. Green, Esq.)(map) |
| Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff(s) in Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Ulster. [State Case Index No. EF2022-1719] (map) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York State Supreme Court - County of Ulster, case number EF2022-1719 (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-6049294) filed by Travis Wilber, Dylan Joslin-Peter, City of Kingston Police Department, City of Kingston. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit: Supreme Court of NYS County of Ulster - State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(map) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
