Scarcella v. Misuraca et al
| Kevin Scarcella |
| Mark Misuraca, Village of Coxsackie, Village of Coxsackie Police Department, Samuel Mento, Mark Evans and Paul Robertson |
| 1:2023cv01382 |
| November 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Frederick J Scullin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TEXT Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 12/18/2023 by telephone. [11:00am-11:05am] Appearances by Ryan Finn, Esq. for plaintiff; Christopher Guetti, Esq. for Deft Misuraca; John Bailey, Esq. and Laura Dunham, Esq. for Deft Village of Coxsackie. Defendant Village of Coxsackie advises the Court that they intend to file a Motion to Dismiss. A briefing schedule is set for that motion and the Rule 16 conference does not proceed at this time. Motion to be filed on or before 1/30/2024; Response to Motion is set for 3/1/2024 (tab) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Kevin Scarcella.(Finn, Ryan) |
| Filing 8 TEXT NOTICE: The Rule 16, Initial Conference in this matter, is now reset for 12/18/2023 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. The conference will be held by telephone. Counsel are directed to DIAL IN @ 518-217-2288 and use Conference ID 226 081 627 # to connect to the conference call. (tab) |
| Filing 7 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Mark Evans, Samuel Mento, Paul Robertson, Village of Coxsackie, Village of Coxsackie Police Department. (Peck, Crystal) |
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Letter Motion from Ryan Finn for Kevin Scarcella requesting Adjournment of Rule 16 Conference : The Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/11/2023. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) The Initial Conference is reset for 12/18/2023 @ 10:00 AM in Albany. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 11/22/2023. (tab)
|
| Filing 5 Letter Motion from Ryan Finn for Kevin Scarcella requesting Adjournment of Rule 16 Conference submitted to Judge Hummel . (Finn, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Crystal R. Peck on behalf of Mark Evans, Samuel Mento, Paul Robertson, Village of Coxsackie, Village of Coxsackie Police Department (Peck, Crystal) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Mark Evans, Samuel Mento, Paul Robertson, Village of Coxsackie, Village of Coxsackie Police Department Demand for Complaint (Peck, Crystal) |
| Filing 2 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 12/4/2023 at 09:30 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 11/27/2023. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (hmr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Albany County Supreme Court, case number 908304-23 (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-6501465) filed by Mark Evans, Village of Coxsackie Police Department, Paul Robertson, Samuel Mento, Village of Coxsackie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hmr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
