Centerra Group, LLC v. United States Court Security Officers Union
| Centerra Group, LLC |
| United States Court Security Officers Union |
| 1:2023cv01391 |
| November 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Pre-Motion Response to #7 Pre-Motion Letter by Centerra Group, LLC, Centerra Group, LLC requesting a pre-motion conference submitted to Judge D'Agostino and Pre-Motion Letter by USCSO. (Swearengen, Kate) |
| Filing 7 Pre-Motion Letter by Centerra Group, LLC, Centerra Group, LLC requesting a pre-motion conference submitted to Judge D'Agostino. (Gumaer, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Timothy Gumaer on behalf of Centerra Group, LLC (Gumaer, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Centerra Group, LLC by United States Court Security Officers Union.(Swearengen, Kate) |
| ***Answer due date updated for #5 Counterclaim for Centerra Group, LLC answer due 12/21/2023. (ztc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kate Montgomery Swearengen on behalf of United States Court Security Officers Union (Swearengen, Kate) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Court Security Officers Union. (see) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS(ES): Centerra Group, LLC is requesting summons(es) be issued as to United States Court Security Officers Union (Goodman, Bryn) |
| TEXT NOTICE OF FILING DEFICIENCY regarding the #1 Complaint/MOTION to Modify, Correct or Vacate Arbitration Award filed by Centerra Group, LLC. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the following Filing Deficiency: Proposed Summons(es) were not included with the Complaint. Counsel is directed to file proposed summons(es) on the docket using the REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS(ES) event within 3 days of this notice. Notice of Filing Deficiency Deadline 11/13/2023 (see) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT/MOTION to Modify, Correct or Vacate Arbitration Award filed by Centerra Group, LLC. Motion returnable before Judge Mae A. D'Agostino. Response to Motion due by 12/4/2023. {Filing fee paid: $402.00, Receipt No. ANYNDC-6502708} (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (see) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Centerra Group, LLC v. United States Court Security Officers Union | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Counter defendant: Centerra Group, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Bryn F. Goodman |
| Represented By: | Timothy Gumaer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Counter claimant: United States Court Security Officers Union | |
| Represented By: | Kate Montgomery Swearengen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
