Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
Correction Officer John Doe and John Doe |
1:2023cv01510 |
November 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Andrew T Baxter |
Mitchell J Katz |
Brenda K Sannes |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to US Magistrate Judge Mitchell J. Katz for all further proceedings. US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter no longer assigned to case. Authorized by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 1/5/2024. (mmg). |
Filing 9 ORDER: Granting #8 Motion for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference, subject to the additional conditions set forth in Attachment "A." Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter 1/2/2024. (kmc) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Discovery filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/10/2024 (Attachments: #1 Motion, #2 Memorandum of Law, #3 Exhibit(s) A- Williamson, #4 Exhibit(s) B-Paige, #5 Exhibit(s) C- Staltzer, #6 Proposed Order/Judgment) Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (James, Jacqueline) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER: Granting #6 Letter Motion requesting leave to file a motion seeking leave to file a third-party subpoena pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1) and adjourning any scheduled Initial Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. SO ORDERED by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 12/11/2023. (kmc) |
Filing 6 Letter Motion by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC requesting Leave to File a Motion for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference. (James, Jacqueline) Modified on 12/11/2023. (kmc) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER: granting Direct Assignment. The cases are deemed related. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 12/1/2023. (nmk) |
Filing 4 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding 26 Copyrights, see attached list for details. (jmb) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: A Time and Date for a Rule 16 Conference will be determined in the future. This is an ADR track case. (jmb) |
Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (jmb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT with JURY DEMAND: against John Doe, subscriber assigned IP address 207.251.228.99 (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANYNDC-6527124) filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - List of 26 Total Works Infringed, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jmb) |
TEXT Notice pursuant to General Order 12 of Potential Related Case(s), submitted to District Judge for review and determination. Potential Related cases: 5:23-CV-246 and 5:23-CV-253 (BKS/ATB). (jmb) |
TEXT NOTICE: Although the plaintiff herein has named a John Doe defendant in the Complaint, the Clerk's Office will not issue summons(es) for service of process on a John Doe defendant at this time. In the event plaintiff wishes to pursue the claims against this defendant, plaintiff shall take reasonable steps to ascertain their identity. When plaintiff determines the identity of the John Doe defendant, plaintiff may seek to amend the pleading to add the properly named defendant pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 15 and summons(es) will be issued at that time. (jmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.