Cromling v. HMA Contracting Corp. et al
Ira Cromling, Jr. |
HMA Contracting Corp., Michael Hamel and Eugene Kluck |
1:2024cv00431 |
March 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Anne M Nardacci |
Daniel J Stewart |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 American Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference set for 6/27/2024 at 10:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 6/20/2024. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (ztc) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to HMA Contracting Corp. (Attachments: #1 Summons issued as to Michael Hamel, #2 Summons issued as to Eugene Kluck)(ztc) |
CLERKS NOTICE: Clerk filed a redacted and unredacted version of the Complaint as Plaintiff's home address is listed in paragraph one. Clerk redacted the address pursuant to Local Rule 5.2. The unredacted version is restricted to Case participants. (ztc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against HMA Contracting Corp., Michael Hamel and, Eugene Kluck (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANYNDC-6673733) filed by Ira Cromling, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Complaint- Unredacted, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.