Mendez et al v. Prime Management Consultants LLC et al
| Angel Mendez, Ledwin Aparicio, Erick Ixim, Reynaldo Lopez and Vicente Armijos |
| David Ryan Friedlander and Prime Management Consultants LLC |
| 1:2024cv01301 |
| October 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Anne M Nardacci |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference set for 1/22/2025 at 09:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 1/15/2025. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (ztc) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Prime Management Consultants LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons issued as to David Ryan Friedlander)(ztc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Prime Management Consultants LLC and David Ryan Friedlander (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANYNDC-6910521) filed by Angel Mendez, Vicente Armijos, Erick Ixim, Reynaldo Lopez, Ledwin Aparicio. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
