Yonaty v. Amerada Hess Corporation
| Mark B. Yonaty |
| Amerada Hess Corporation |
| Amerada Hess Corporation |
| Mark B. Yonaty |
| 3:2004cv00605 |
| October 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| David E. Peebles |
| Frederick J. Scullin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION: This action is hereby dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, and without costs or fees to any party. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 9/30/2009. (mae)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: GRANTING Defendant's 57 Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Plaintiff's PMPA claim. Defendant shall advise the court within ten days of the date of this Order and opposing counsel in writing whether it intends to proceed with its breach-of-contract counterclaim. If Defendant advises the Court and opposing counsel, the Court will schedule a telephone conference with the parties to set a trial date for this matter. If Defendant advises the Court a nd opposing counsel that it does not intend to proceed, the Court shall dismiss that counterclaim based on Defendant's representation and the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant w/respect to Plaintiff's claims and close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 8/31/09. (dmf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
