Doe et al v. Bucci et al
| 3:2005cv00740 |
| June 13, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| David E. Peebles |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
DECISION & ORDER denying Pltf's 8 Letter Request/Motion for Reconsideration of 5 Order . Signed by Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/15/05. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER denying 3 Motion for TRO with leave to renew; Show Cause Hearing set for 7/13/2005 10:00 AM in Albany before Judge Thomas J. McAvoy. Show Cause Response due by 6/26/2005. Pltfs supplemental papers, if any, due by 6/20/05; parties shall file and serve addt'l briefs by 6/27/05; Pltf's application for an expedited hrg is denied; Pltf's application to proceed anonymously is granted on a temp basis pending further briefing; Pltfs' to file redacted doc's within 3 days of this OTC; Defts shall respond to the motion using the chart of pseudonyms attached to Pltfs' counsels delcaration; Pltfs' application for TRO is denied with leave to renew upon proper papers; Service to be made by 6/16/05. Signed by Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/14/05. (sfp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doe et al v. Bucci et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
