Browne v. Commissioner of Social Security
3:2006cv01515 |
December 18, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Binghamton Office |
Lawrence E. Kahn |
George H. Lowe |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 19) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED, that Plaintiffs Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be AFFIRMED and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion to substitute attorney (Dkt. No. 20) is GRANTED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 03, 2009. (sas) |
Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Defendants's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be GRANTED, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleading be DENIED, and that the decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED. Objections to R&R due by 5/19/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 5/5/09. (dmf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Browne v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.