Hickey v. Myers et al
| Thomas J. Hickey |
| Anne C. Myers, Donald P. Zingale and The State University of New York College of Agriculture and Technology at Cobleskill |
| 3:2009cv01307 |
| November 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Otsego |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| David E. Peebles |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 69 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 82 Letter Request, ; denying 88 Motion in Limine: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude evidence of his computer usage and certain e-mails sent to other faculty (Dkt. No. 69) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion in limine to preclude evidence of Plaintiff's previo us lawsuit against his former employer (Dkt. No. 88) is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion to quash the subpoena to SUNY Chancellor Zimpher (Dkt. No. 82-3) is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' m otion to quash the subpoena to Vice President Smith seeking outside reports of College admission and financial aid policies (Dkt. No. 82-3) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion to quash the subpoena to Vice President Smith seeking all incidents of workplace violence (Dkt. No. 82-3) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decisionand Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 6/3/13. (ban)
|
|
Filing
67
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defts' 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 2/10/12. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER: subject to the following qualifications, 1) paragraph 9 of the stipulation is not approved, 2) any party seeking leave to file with the court confidential information obtained during pretrial discovery and subject to this protective order must apply for and obtain court permission to file such information under seal, 3) upon the filing of any such application, the court will make a determination as to whether a sufficient showing has been make in order to justify the requested sealing. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 12/21/2010. (jmb)
|
|
Filing
28
DECISION AND ORDER granting Defts' 19 Motion to Dismiss as to Pltf's First Amendment retaliation claim and equal protection claim and denying the motion in all other respects. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/2/2010. (amt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
