Miller v. City of Ithaca, New York et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Miller
Defendant: City of Ithaca, New York, Edward Vallely, John Barber, Pete Tyler, The Ithaca Police Benevolent Association, Inc., Jeffrey Huddle, Tompkins County District Attorney's Office and John Doe(s) and/or Jane Doe(s)
Case Number: 3:2010cv00597
Filed: May 20, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Binghamton Office
County: Broome
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. McAvoy
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 896 ORDER that Defendants' motion in limine (Dkt. No. 848 ), to the extent it seeks to admit some form of the arbitration decision at trial, is GRANTED; that Plaintiff's motion in limine (Dkt. No. 849 ), to the extent it opposes giving the arbitration decision and/or factual findings preclusive effect at trial, is GRANTED and that these motions (Dkt. Nos. 848 - 849 ) are otherwise DENIED. Plaintiff's additional motion in limine (Dkt. No. 850 ), being duplicative of Dkt. No. [8 49], is DENIED as moot. The parties are directed to meet and confer on stipulations of fact for the joint pre-trial stipulation, and to file a joint pre-trial stipulation, in accord with the Court's Trial Order, by November 29, 2019. The parti es are directed to file a proposed jury instruction concerning the arbitrator's decision by November 29, 2019. The Court reserves decision on a ruling under Fed. Rule Evid. 403 and the portions of the arbitration decision to be admitted at trial. An in-person pretrial conference concerning these matters and the parties' pending motions in limine (Dkt. Nos. 875 and 876 ) is scheduled for January 8, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 11/12/2019. (rjb, )
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 852 ORDER granting 836 Motion for a Rule 35 examination of plaintiff. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 8/8/2019. (rjb, )
June 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 830 ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for a turnover order (Dkt. No. 817 ) is GRANTED and that Tompkins Trust Company shall pay to Plaintiff Christopher Miller the funds of Defendant City of Ithaca that Tompkins Trust Company has in its possession or custody to the extent sufficient to satisfy the $20,000 judgment entered on September 7, 2016 and the $520,327 in attorney's fees and costs awarded in a separate judgment on January 5, 2017. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 6/17/2019. (rjb, )
April 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 814 ORDER denying 806 Motion for Stay pending appeal and expedited review. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 4/3/2019. (rjb, )
January 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 785 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That Miller's motion for attorney's fees, costs, and disbursements (Dkt. Nos. 750, 778) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: GRANTED to the extent that attorney's fees in the amount of  6;492,706.73 and expenses in the amount of $27,620.27 are imposed against defendants the City of Ithaca, New York Edward Vallely, John Barber, and Pete Tyler; DENIED in all other respects. That defendants' motion for a stay without bond (Dkt. No. 768) is GRANTED. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/5/2017. (jel, )
December 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 697 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That defendants' 666 Motion for a Stay is DENIED AS MOOT. That defendants' 678 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the alternative, for remittitur or new trial is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: GRANTED to the extent that the court orders a new trial solely on the issue of damages on the beat assignment claim unless Miller agrees to accept remittitur of the jury's $220,000 compensatory damages awas to $50 ,000 within fourteen (14) days fo the date of the Memorandum-Decision and Order. That the defendants' 692 Motion for Attorney Fees is DENIED. That Miller's 688 Motion for Attorney Fees is held in abeyance pending Miller's election as to remittitur. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 12/17/2015. (jel, )
September 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 583 SUMMARY ORDER - That defendants' 575 motion requesting permission to file a reply is GRANTED and the proposed rely is deemed FILED. That defendants' 573 motion for reconsideration or relief from an order is DENIED. That Miller's 574 application for fees and costs and other relief relevant to Rule 11 is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 9/29/2014. (jel, )
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 572 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That defendants' 558 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. That the case is trial ready and the Clerk shall issue a trial scheduling order in due course. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/28/2014. (jel, )
December 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 528 DECISION AND ORDER denying 465 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 467 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting in part and denying in part 472 and 474 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and for New Trial; denying 475 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/21/12. (sfp, )
August 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 301 DECISION AND ORDER denying Defendant's 289 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 8/7/2012. (amt)
June 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 288 DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 244 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/1/2012. (amt)
May 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 284 DECISION AND ORDER denying Defendants' 244 Motion for Summary Judgment as untimely and denying as moot Plaintiff's 278 Letter Request/motion to strike. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 5/4/2012. (amt)
May 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 276 DECISION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 263 Letter Brief and directing documents 256 , 257 , 258 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , and 275 will not be considered in connection w/the instant motion. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 5/2/2012. (amt)
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defts' 18 , 31 , and 33 Motions to Dismiss; All claims as to Defts County of Tompkins, Wilkinson, Huddle, and the Ithaca Police Benevolent Association are DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 9/22/2010. (amt)
July 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 DECISION AND ORDER imposing sanctions in the amount of $150.00, payable to the Court's pro bono fund and directing Atty Bosman make such payment w/in 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 7/28/2010. (amt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. City of Ithaca, New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Miller
Represented By: AJ Bosman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Ithaca, New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Vallely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pete Tyler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Ithaca Police Benevolent Association, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Huddle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tompkins County District Attorney's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe(s) and/or Jane Doe(s)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?