Cross v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Lawrence Cross
Defendant: Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., State Farm Insurance Company and John Doe
Case Number: 3:2010cv01179
Filed: October 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Binghamton Office
County: Otsego
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. McAvoy
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 128 DECISION AND ORDER granting Defendant's 108 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff's 117 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff's 123 Motion for Reconsideration; denying Plaintiff's 125 Motion to Appoint Counsel as moot; denying Plaintiff's 126 Letter Request for a judicial settlement and dismissing Plaintiff's remaining claims. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 2/22/2013. (amt) [Pltf served via reg. and cert. mail]
October 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 60 DECISION AND ORDER denying without prejudice Pltf's application to amend his complaint; granting Deft's 44 Motion to Dismiss and dismissing portions of Pltf's Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 10/17/2011. (amt) [Pltf served via reg. mail]
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 DECISION AND ORDER granting Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss and the Sixth, Eigth, and Tenth Causes of Action, and Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages, are dismissed. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave of 20 days of the date of this Decision and Order. Failure to file a second amended complaint will be deemed an abandonment of the leave and the case will proceed on the remaining claims. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 6/6/2011. (amt) [Pltf served via reg. mail]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cross v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence Cross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?