Dataflow, Inc. et al v. Peerless Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Dataflow, Inc., Dataflow, LLC and Dataflow Reprographics, LLC
Defendant: Peerless Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2011cv01127
Filed: September 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Binghamton Office
County: Broome
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 97 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 86) for reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on October 15, 2015. (sas)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that consistent with this Memorandum-Decision and Order, Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 56) for summary judgment and Plaintiffs Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 58) are each GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and i t is further ORDERED, that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order, the parties may file additional summary judgment motions to resolve the issue of the number of occurrences of employee dishonesty consistent with the Courts findings in this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 30, 2014. (sas)
January 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 46) is APPROVED and ADOPTED except as to the language of the adverse inference jury instruction, on which decision is DEFERRED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on January 13, 2014. (sas)
April 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER: setting forth the terms and conditions for the exchange of confidential materials, information and documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 4/30/2012. (jmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dataflow, Inc. et al v. Peerless Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dataflow, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas S. D'Antonio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dataflow, LLC
Represented By: Thomas S. D'Antonio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dataflow Reprographics, LLC
Represented By: Thomas S. D'Antonio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peerless Insurance Company
Represented By: Roy A. Mura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?