Norwood et al v. Salvatore et al
| Douglas Norwood, III, LeeAnn Norwood, D.N., Paul Orlowski and Lena Orlowski |
| Michael Salvatore and Town of Hancock |
| 3:2012cv01025 |
| June 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Delaware |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| David E. Peebles |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiffs' motion for attorney's fees (Dkt. No. 92 ) is GRANTED in part; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiffs are awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $37,0 27.50, and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiffs are awarded costs in the amount of $861.85, and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial (Dkt. No. 89 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 is GRANTED on the issue of Plaintiffs' compensatory damages unless Plaintiffs file and serve, within 10 days from the filing of this Order, a written acceptance of remittitur of the award of compensatory damages to $73,000.00; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules.Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/15/2016. (ban)
|
|
Filing
70
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion in Limine: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motion in limine is GRANTED as to (1) evidence of an alleged racist agenda and de facto zoning scheme designed to exclude mi norities; (2) evidence of disparate treatment of Plaintiffs as compared to other applicants for building or zoning permits in the Town; and (3) evidence that Defendants forced Plaintiffs to do unnecessary preparatory work on their property prior to t he issuance of a building permit; and DENIED as to evidence of Defendant Salvatore's alleged racist statements to the extent permitted by this Memorandum-Decision and Order; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' oral motion in limine as to Defendant Salvatore's termination is RESERVED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 05/29/2015. (bto)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED in part as follows; and the Court further OR DERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to the Orlowski Plaintiffs' equal protection claim; and the Court furtherORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to the NorwoodPlaintiffs' substantive due process claim. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 2/13/15. (ban)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED inpart; and the Court further ORDER S that the Norwood Plaintiffs' equal protection claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; and the Court furtherORDERS that the Orlowski Plaintiffs' selective enforcement equal protection claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 1/17/14. (ban)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 4/10/13. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
