Carr v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Lisa Carr
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Case Number: 3:2012cv01768
Filed: November 30, 2012
Court: New York Northern District Court
Office: Binghamton Office
County: Broome
Presiding Judge: Glenn T. Suddaby
Referring Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 25, 2014 13 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION & ORDER granting Plaintiff's #[10} motion for judgment on the pleadings; denying Defendant's # 11 motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 11) is DENIED; and remanding this matter to Defendant, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g), for further proceedings consistent with this Decision and Order. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/25/14. (lmw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carr v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Carr
Represented By: Peter A. Gorton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.