Mastronardi v. Village of Hancock et al
| Amy Lynn Mastronardi |
| Village of Hancock and George Ronk |
| Village of Hancock |
| George Ronk |
| 3:2013cv01281 |
| October 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Delaware |
| David E. Peebles |
| Frederick J. Scullin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Ronk in his official capacity are DISMISSED. The Court further DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Ronk in his individual capacity for failure to prosecute. [Copy of Judgment and # 29 Text Order served upon defendant Ronk via certified mail.] (nmk)
|
|
Filing
27
PARTIAL JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Defendant Village's motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against it is GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's state-law claim; i.e., her fifth cause of action, against Defendant Village is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. The Court further ORDERS that, finding no just reason for delay, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Village and against Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Copy served upon pro se defendant via regular mail.] (nmk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
