Mid Atlantic Framing, LLC v. Varish Construction, Inc. et al
| Mid Atlantic Framing, LLC |
| Varish Construction, Inc., Ava Realty Ithaca, LLC, Ava Development LLC, Tom Varnish, Ajesh Patel, John Doe No.1 through John Doe No. 20, 359 Hospitality Associates, LLC and Seneca Supply, LLC d/b/a The Duke Company |
| 3:2013cv01376 |
| November 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Tompkins |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| David E. Peebles |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
211
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER re 209 Motion for Default Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Mid Atlantic's motion for entry of default judgment as to damages for the principal amount due Mid Atlantic and for prejudgment interest (Dkt. No. 209) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Mid Atlantic's motion for entry of default judgment as to punitive damages is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in Mid Atlantic's favor a gainst Defendant Tom Varish in the amount of $1,056,793.99; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 6/25/19. (ban)
|
|
Filing
180
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 162 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 8/3/2018. (ban)
|
|
Filing
161
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 140 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 141 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 159 Letter Request; denying 160 Letter Request: The Court hereby ORDERS that Mid Atlantic's request to strike th e Varish Certification and both Varish Declarations is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the parties' letter motions seeking to further address Mid Atlantic's request is strike (Dkt. Nos. 159 & 160) are DENIED as moot; and the Court further ORDERS that the parties' cross- motions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 140 & 141) are DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/29/2018. (ban)
|
|
Filing
155
DECISION AND ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that discovery is reopened for the limited purpose of deposing Tom Varish; and the Court further ORDERS that any such deposition shall be completed within ten (10) days of the date of this Decision and Orde r; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall terminate Plaintiff's pending letter motion; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 10/25/2017. (ban)
|
|
Filing
151
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's appeal of Magistrate Judge Peebles' December 7, 2016 order is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Defendant V arish as to the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and tenth causes of action (Dkt. No. 117 ) is GRANTED as to liability; and the Court furtherORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Defendant 359 Hospitality Associates, LLC as to the ninth cause of action (Dkt. No. 118 ) is GRANTED as to liability; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/11/2017. (ban)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 82 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendant WSFS's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court is directed to te rminate WSFS as a Defendant in this action; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/14/2016. (ban, )
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 48 Motion for Leave to File: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendant AVA's motion for partial judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the Court furtherORDERS that Plaintiff's cross-motion for leave to file a second amended verified complaint is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff shall file a signed copy of its Second Am ended Verified Complaint, with such alterations as are consistent with this Memorandum-Decision and Order,within TEN (10) DAYS; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of the Second Amended Verified Complaint on the additionall y named Defendant, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, within TWENTYONE (21) DAYS, in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and the Court furtherORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 7/24/2015. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
