Maki v. The Travelers Companies, Inc. et al
| Frank Maki |
| The Travelers Companies, Inc., Northland Insurance Company, LoVullo Associates, Mang Insurance Agency, William Halpin, Dawn Varga, Barbara Fowler, Stephanie Tweedie, Molly Janitz, Melissa Prisco and Michelle Meschke |
| 3:2014cv00008 |
| January 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Delaware |
| David E. Peebles |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
DECISION & ORDER re 24 & 37 MOTIONS to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. ORDERED that the defendants' motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint are hereby GRANTED. The Plaintiff's claims brought pursuant to the Sherman Anti-Trust Act are dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state-law claims. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 5/28/2015. (dpk)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting 4 Report-Recommendation and Order. The Court ADOPTS the Report, Recommendation and Order for reasons stated therein. The 1 Complaint is DISMISSED and SUPERSEDED in all respects by the Amended Complaint. The Court offers opinion as to the legal viability of the claims put forth in the Amended Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/19/2014. (dpk) [Sent copy of Order to Pro Se Plaintiff via U.S. Mail]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
