Kost v. Louis Mosier Trust et al
Michael G. Kost, Sr. |
Craig Mosier, Louis Mosier Trust, John Doe and Jane Doe |
3:2014cv00090 |
January 28, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Binghamton Office |
Broome |
David E. Peebles |
Gary L. Sharpe |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SUMMARY ORDER - ORDERED that Kost' s motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 10) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to enter judgment against the Louis Mosier Trust, and Craig Mosier, individually and in hi s capacity as Trustee of the Louis Mosier Trust, in the amount of $156,268.83, plus $32,816.45, and $38.53 per diem from April 30, 2014 until judgment is entered, in prejudgment interest, plus any applicable bill of costs; and it is fu rther ORDERED that the note and mortgage recorded in the Ontario County Clerks Office, bearing instrument number 2951 and serial number 4908 recorded on March 19, 1998 at 2:00 P.M. at Book 1009 of Mortgages, Page 155 and as continues thereafter, in the face amount of $275,000 and listing Michael G. Kost, Sr. as mortgagor and Mosier Enterprises, Inc., a New York corporation, and Louis Mosier as mortgagee is SATISFIED and to be DISCHARGED of record; and it is further. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 9/3/2014. (jel, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.