Dove v. City of Binghamton et al
| Donald M. Dove |
| Binghamton Police Department, City of Binghamton and Police Officer John Doe |
| 3:2014cv00627 |
| May 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Chemung |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| David E. Peebles |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
DECISION AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting Report and Recommendations re 6 Report and Recommendations: The Court hereby ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Peebles Amended Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 6) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 2) is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff is directed to pay the full filing fee of $400 no later than thirty(30) days from the date of this Decision and Order; and the Court furtherORDERS that, if Plaintiff fails to pay the full filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order, the Clerk of the Court shall enter j udgment in Defendants' favor and close this case without further order of this Court; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve this Decision and Order on Plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 10/16/14. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
