Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Admiral Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Liberty Insurance Corporation
Defendant: Admiral Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2014cv00949
Filed: July 29, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Binghamton Office
County: Otsego
Presiding Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER re 34 Motion to Enforce Judgment; 34 Motion for Sanctions: The Court hereby ORDERS that Liberty's motion (Dkt. No. 34) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth herein; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment in Liberty's favor in the amount of $22,403.14, plus interest at 9% per annum from August 19, 2014 through the date that this Memorandum-Decision and Order is filed, and close this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 6/7/2016. (ban)
April 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 14 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED; and theCourt further ORDERS tha t Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Admiral's policy applies on a primary basis as compared to Liberty's policy for the defendants State University Construction Fund, Christa Constr uction, LLC, and Schenectady Steel Co. Inc. in the actions entitled Kevin Harrington v. State University Construction Fund, Christa Construction, LLC, and Schenectady Steel Co. Inc., Index No. 244917/13, pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Rensselaer, and respondents The State of New York and State University of New York College at Oneonta in the action entitled Kevin Harrington v. The State of New York and State University of New York College at Oneonta, Claim No. 13- 155, in the State of New York Court of Claims; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendant's Counterclaim is DISMISSED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 4/17/15. (ban)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Admiral Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Liberty Insurance Corporation
Represented By: Marshall T. Potashner
Represented By: David R. Shyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Admiral Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?