Sawabini v. O'Connor Hospital et al
Plaintiff: |
Lutfallah T. Sawabini |
Defendant: |
O'Connor Hospital and Edward McGrath |
Case Number: |
3:2015cv00692 |
Filed: |
June 8, 2015 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Office: |
Binghamton Office |
County: |
Delaware |
Presiding Judge: |
Lawrence E. Kahn |
Presiding Judge: |
David E. Peebles |
Nature of Suit: |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 6, 2017 |
Filing
131
DECISION AND ORDERED, that the Bassett Motion (Dkt. No. 115) is GRANTED in part as to Southworth. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on October 06, 2017. (Copy served via regular and certified)(sas)
|
August 28, 2017 |
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDERED, that the State Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 82) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Bassett Defendants motions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 115, 116) are GRANTED in part as to McCarthy, Hodgman, and McGrath, and that the Court reserves decision on such motions to the extent that they involve Southworths role in Sawabinis confinement; and it is further ORDERED, that within fourteen days of this Memorandum-Decision and Or der, the Bassett Defendants shall submit additional evidentiary material, not to exceed ten pages, that properly supports their assertion that they were aware of threats made by Sawabini that suggested he was a danger to himself or to others, and tha t Sawabini may file a response, not to exceed ten pages, to this supplemental material within fourteen days of the Bassett Defendants filing; and it is further ORDERED, that Carentzs motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 104) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Sawabinis cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 106) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on August 28, 2017. (Copy served via regular mail)(sas)
|
October 6, 2015 |
Filing
9
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 6) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)( ii); and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court forward the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 7) and the Supplemental Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 8) to U.S. Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles for initial review. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on October 6, 2015.***A copy of this order was served upon the pro se plaintiff by regular US mail. (sas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?