United States of America v. Marshall
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Marcia Marshall
Case Number: 3:2015cv01188
Filed: October 5, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Binghamton Office
County: Chenango
Presiding Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER re 10 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Marcia Marshall filed by United States of America: The Court hereby ORDERS that the Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment is GRANTED; and the Court furthe r ORDERS that damages are awarded in the following amounts:(1) unpaid principal and prejudgment interest of $21,254.65; (2) post-judgment interest accruing at the statutory rates as discussed above; andthe Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff 9;s request for costs in the amount of $25.00 for the statutory fee for service and travel is denied; the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and close this case. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 2/27/2017. (ban)
July 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion for Default Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is GRANTED as to liability and DENIED as to damages; and the Court furth er ORDERS that Plaintiff shall submit a supplemental memorandum, accompanied by an affidavit and evidence substantiating its claimed damages, as set forth above, within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order; and the Court further ORDERS that if Plaintiff fails to comply with the terms of this Memorandum-Decision and Order within THIRTY (30) DAYS, the Clerk is directed to return this file to the Court which may issue a sua sponte order dismissing this action f or failure to prosecute, failure to comply with this Court's Order, and/or failure to comply with the Federal and Local Rules; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on Defendant by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested and docket the returned receipt within THREE (3) DAYS of its return; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum- Decision and Order on Plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 7/18/2016. (ban)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Linda L. Donovan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marcia Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?