Shibata et al v. Swingle et al
Tomo Shibata and Yayoi Shibata |
Roger A. Swingle and RAS Enterprises |
3:2016cv01349 |
November 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Binghamton Office |
Broome |
David E. Peebles |
Brenda K. Sannes |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 ORDER adopting 98 Report and Recommendations and granting 58 Motion to Dismiss the counterclaims. Defendants' counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 12/3/2018. (rjb, ) |
Filing 95 DECISION AND ORDER that plaintiff's letter motion (Dkt. No. 89 ) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that defendants' motion for costs and attorney's fees (Dkt. No. 63 ) is GRANTED, and that defendants recover from plaintiffs, j ointly and severally, the amount of $892.00 in attorney's fees, and $150.00 in costs, for a total amount of $1,042.00, and that the clerk enter judgment in defendants' favor and against plaintiffs in that amount; and is further ORDERED, that plaintiffs' motion for sanctions (Dkt. No. 77 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 10/10/2018. (sal ) |
Filing 91 ORDER adopting 61 Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 40 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 10/9/2018. (sal ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.