Crews v. The City of Ithaca et al
| Sarah Crews |
| The City of Ithaca and John R. Barber |
| 3:2017cv00213 |
| February 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Tioga |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| David E. Peebles |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 90 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 107 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 1/26/21. (ban)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) claims against Defendant Ithaca is GRANTED as to Claim 4 and DENIED as to Claim 1, Claim 2, Claim 3, Claim 5, Claim 6, Claim 7, and Claim 8; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) Defendant Barber is GRANTED as to Claim 1, Claim 2, Claim 3, and Claim 4 and DENIED as to Claim 5, Claim 6 , Claim 7, and Claim 8; and the court furtherORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/21/2018. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
