Profitt v. Freedman et al
Plaintiff: Donna Profitt
Defendant: Donald S. Freedman, Barbra Oakley, Physician Medical Review Officer, Inc. and American Medical Review Officers, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2017cv00715
Filed: June 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Binghamton Office
County: Broome
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 11) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs amended complaint (Dkt. No. 10) is DISMISSED with prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment for the Defendants and close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on February 06, 2018. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(sas)
August 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e); and it is further ORD ERED, that if Plaintiff wishes to amend her complaint, she must file a signed amended complaint that cures the pleading defects identified in the Report-Recommendation within thirty days from the filing date of this Order; and it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within thirty days from the filing date of this Order, her complaint shall be DISMISSED with prejudice without further order from the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on August 29, 2017. (Copy served via regular mail)(sas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Profitt v. Freedman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donna Profitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald S. Freedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barbra Oakley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Physician Medical Review Officer, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Medical Review Officers, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?