Profitt v. Freedman et al
||Donald S. Freedman, Barbra Oakley, Physician Medical Review Officer, Inc. and American Medical Review Officers, Inc.
||June 30, 2017
||US District Court for the Northern District of New York
||Lawrence E. Kahn
||David E. Peebles
|Nature of Suit:
||Personal Injury: Health Care
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 6, 2018
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 11) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs amended complaint (Dkt. No. 10) is DISMISSED with prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment for the Defendants and close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on February 06, 2018. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(sas)
|August 29, 2017
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e); and it is further ORD ERED, that if Plaintiff wishes to amend her complaint, she must file a signed amended complaint that cures the pleading defects identified in the Report-Recommendation within thirty days from the filing date of this Order; and it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within thirty days from the filing date of this Order, her complaint shall be DISMISSED with prejudice without further order from the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on August 29, 2017. (Copy served via regular mail)(sas)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?