BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Mobius Business Solutions, LLC et al
| BMO Harris Bank N.A. |
| Mobius Business Solutions, LLC, Mobius Assets, LLC, Mobius Logistics, Inc., D&T Trucking, Inc., David Wickwire, Travis Wickwire and Derek Sherman |
| 3:2017cv01037 |
| September 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Tompkins |
| David E. Peebles |
| Brenda K. Sannes |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER that Defendants' motion to vacate the Clerk's entry of judgment (Dkt. No. 39 ) is DENIED. ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 36 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's request for def ault judgment is GRANTED as to: liability of D&T on Plaintiff's claim for breach of contract (First Cause of Action); liability of Mobius Assets on Plaintiff's claim for breach of contract (Third Cause of Action); and liability of Mobius B S, Mobius Assets, David Wickwire and Derek Sherman on Plaintiff's claim for breach of guaranty (Second Cause of Action); and liability of D&T, Mobius BS, Mobius Logistics, David Wickwire and Derek Sherman on Plaintiff's claim for breach of guaranty (Fourth Cause of Action). Plaintiff's request for default judgment with respect to damages is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 8/14/2018. (rjb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
