Whitehead v. Endicott Police Department et al
Jack Whitehead |
Village of Endicott and Mr. Ketchum |
3:2018cv00052 |
January 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Binghamton Office |
Broome |
David E. Peebles |
Glenn T. Suddaby |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 DECISION AND ORDER accepting and adopting Magistrate Judge Peebles' # 7 Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff's complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice unless within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Or der, he files an Amended Complaint that corrects the pleading defects identified in the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's # 10 letter-motion seeking an extension of time to file an Amended Complaint is denied without prejudice as moot. T he document on the docket entitled Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 11 ) is sua sponte STRICKEN as violative of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), 10(a) and (b), and 12(b)(6), and Local Rule 7.1(a)(4) of the Local Rules of Practice for this Court. Should Plaintiff fi le an Amended Complaint within thirty days of the date of this Decision and Order, that Amended Complaint shall be referred to Magistrate Judge Peebles for his review. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 4/10/18. (lmw) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail with copy of NDNY's Pro Se Handbook and Local Rules of Practice). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.