Ouderkirk v. The United States et al
| Jennifer A. Ouderkirk |
| The United States, John C. Rowley and Andrew McElwee |
| 3:2018cv00053 |
| January 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Binghamton Office |
| Tompkins |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| David E. Peebles |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 12) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 9) is DISMISSED with prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs motion to submit a second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 16) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on April 12, 2018. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(sas)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 2) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs amended complaint (Dkt. No. 9) is referred to the Magistrate Judge for review. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 01, 2018. (Copy served via regular mail)(sas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
