Kelley v. Ithaca College et al
| Christopher Andrew Kelley |
| Daniel H. Robinson, Susan Bassett, Ithaca College and Becky M. Robinson |
| 3:2018cv01082 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| David E Peebles |
| Gary L Sharpe |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER approving #8 Stipulation that the time for Defendants Ithaca College, Daniel H. Robinson and Susan Bassett to answer or move in response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is hereby extended up to andincluding 11/30/2018. Authorized by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 11/5/2018. (sal )
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, by Daniel H. Robinson, Susan Bassett and by Ithaca College submitted to Judge David E. Peebles. (Attachments: #1 LETTER TO COURT)(Messer, Suzanne) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Susan Bassett, Ithaca College, Daniel H. Robinson filed by Christopher Andrew Kelley.(Shannon, Kelsey) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Gregory Clinton Kelley, Esq.. Counsel is hereby advised that as of January 16, 2018, the NYND has converted to NextGen. Due to this conversion, you must now register for Pro Hac Vice access through your PACER account. This is the only notice you will receive concerning this requirement. You will not have access to electronically file in this case until your Pro Hac Vice request has been processed through the PACER system. Step-by-step instructions on how to complete this process are available at http://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-nextgen. COUNSEL MUST FILE A NOTICE OF APPEARANCE IN THIS ACTION OR HE/SHE WILL NOT RECEIVE NOTIFICATIONS OF ELECTRONIC FILINGS IN THIS CASE. Authorized by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 9/26/2018. (sal )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Gregory Clinton Kelley Filing fee $100, receipt number ANYNDC-4517859. filed by Christopher Andrew Kelley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D) Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Shannon, Kelsey) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Admission Requirement as to Party Plaintiff; Attorney G. Clinton Kelley, Email address is gckesq@gmail.com. Phone number is (412) 454-5599. Admissions due by 9/25/2018. [A copy of this notice was emailed to Attorney Kelley on 9/11/2018.](hmr) |
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 12/21/2018 at 10:00 AM in Binghamton before Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/14/2018. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (hmr) |
| Filing 2 Summonses Issued as to Susan Bassett, Ithaca College, Becky M. Robinson, Daniel H. Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued for Daniel H. Robinson, #2 Summons Issued for Becky M. Robinson, #3 Summons Issued for Susan Bassett)(hmr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Susan Bassett, Ithaca College, Becky M. Robinson, Daniel H. Robinson (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4502788) filed by Christopher Andrew Kelley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hmr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
