Rapiscan Systems, Inc. v. SureScan Corp. et al
Rapiscan Systems, Inc. |
SureScan Corp. and SureScan International Sales, Corp. |
3:2020cv00302 |
March 17, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Miroslav Lovric |
Gary L Sharpe |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by SureScan International Sales, Corp., SureScan Corp.. SureScan International Sales, Corp. waiver sent on 5/6/2020, answer due 7/6/2020; SureScan Corp. waiver sent on 5/6/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. (Cook, John) |
Filing 10 AMENDED Report on the Filing and Determination of an Action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) 10,591,424; 8,223,919; 9,046,465; 8,428,217. [This report was amended to remove Patent Nos. 8,451,974 and 9,158,030, since they were not listed in the Dkt. No. 17 Amended Complaint.] (hmr) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Denis J. Sullivan on behalf of All Defendants (Sullivan, Denis) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John D. Cook on behalf of SureScan Corp., SureScan International Sales, Corp. (Cook, John) |
***Answer due date updated for SureScan Corp. answer due 5/19/2020; SureScan International Sales, Corp. answer due 5/19/2020. (hmr) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Admission Requirement as to Party Plaintiff; Attorney B. Trent Webb, Attorney Aaron E. Hankel, Attorney Lauren E. Douville, and Attorney Sam J. LaRoque. Admissions due by 5/21/2020. Copies of this Notice and the Dkt No. #3 GO 25 Filing Order were mailed to Attorney Webb, Attorney Hankel, Attorney Douville and Attorney LaRoque via regular mail on 5/7/2020. (hmr) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Rapiscan Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) "A" to First Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) "B" to First Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit(s) "C" to First Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit(s) "D" to First Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit(s) "E" to First Amended Complaint, #6 Exhibit(s) "F" to First Amended Complaint)(Powers, John) |
Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Rapiscan Systems, Inc.. (Powers, John) |
Filing 4 Report on the Filing of an Action regarding patent numbers: 10,591,424; 8,223,919; 9,046,465; 8,451,974; 9,158,030; and 8,428,217. (pjh, ) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 6/24/2020 at 11:00 AM in Binghamton before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 6/17/2020. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (pjh, ) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to SureScan International Sales, Corp. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to SureScan Corp.)(pjh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against SureScan Corp. and SureScan International Sales, Corp. (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-5064079) filed by Rapiscan Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Patent US 10,591,424, #3 Exhibit B - Patent US 8,223,919, #4 Exhibit C - Patent US 9,046,465, #5 Exhibit D - Patent US 8,451,974, #6 Exhibit E - Patent US 9,158,030, #7 Exhibit F - Patent US 8,428,217, #8 Exhibit G - SureScan x1000 Index, #9 Exhibit H - SureScan x1000 Photos and Description, #10 Exhibit I - SureScan x1000 Achieves TSA 7.2 Certification, #11 Exhibit J - TSA Fact Sheet)(pjh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.