Regan v. Hon et al
Appellant: Walter Joseph Regan
Appellee: Michele Domres-Hon and Henry Hon
Case Number: 3:2020cv00846
Filed: July 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brenda K Sannes
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Regan's appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 8/13/2021. [Copy served upon pro se appellant via regular and certified mail.] (nmk)
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Appellant is directed to file and serve, by April 6, 2021, either the Appellant's Brief or a response to this Order to Show Cause stating why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. IF THE COURT DOES NOT RECEIVE FROM APPELLANT the Appellant's Brief or a response to this Order to Show Cause ON OR BEFORE APRIL 6, 2021, THIS ACTION WILL BE DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 3/16/2021. (Copy served on appellant via regular mail)(rjb, )
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER that Regan's motion for a stay pending appeal (Dkt. No. 43 ) is DENIED and the Hons' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 41 ) is DENIED. Regan is ordered to file his opening brief no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 2/9/2021. (Copy served on appellant via regular and certified mail)(rjb, )
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER denying 30 and 31 Motions for Reconsideration. Appellant's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 30 ) is construed as a notice of appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals of this Court's Order (Dkt. No. 26 ) denying appoi ntment of counsel, and Appellant's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 31 ) is construed as a notice of appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals of this Court's text order (Dkt. No. 27) denying a certification of a direct appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2)(A). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals at this stage of the proceedings is not in good faith and may not be taken in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 11/12/2020. (Copy served on appellant via regular mail)(rjb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Regan v. Hon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Walter Joseph Regan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Michele Domres-Hon
Represented By: Edward Y. Crossmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Henry Hon
Represented By: Edward Y. Crossmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?