McDaniels v. Mertens
| London McDaniels |
| Nicholas Mertens |
| 3:2021cv00441 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| Miroslav Lovric |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: Letter Motion #6 is GRANTED. Defendant is directed to file a response to the complaint by 7/21/2021. The Rule 16 Initial Conference currently scheduled for 7/21/2021 is re-scheduled for 8/5/2021 at 10:00 a.m., via telephone conference before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric. The Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 7/29/2021. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on 5/21/2021. (jdp )
|
|
Filing 6
Letter Motion from Jorge A. Rodriguez, AAG for Nicholas Mertens requesting extension of time to answer submitted to Judge Mae A. D'Agostino, USDJ . (Rodriguez, Jorge)
|
|
Filing 5
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Nicholas Mertens on April 30, 2021, filed by London McDaniels. (Kopko, Edward)
|
|
***Answer due date updated for Nicholas Mertens answer due 5/21/2021. (pjh, )
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT-ONLY NOTICE REGARDING JUDGE D'AGOSTINO CASE DISPOSITION PILOT - Please refer to the Individual Rules and Practices of the Hon. Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge, for guidance regarding the Case Disposition Pilot. https://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/sites/nynd/files/MAD_Rules_of_Practice_04_14_2020.pdf. (pjh, )
|
|
Filing 3
G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Telephone Conference set for 7/21/2021 at 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 7/14/2021. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (pjh, )
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Nicholas Mertens. (pjh, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Nicholas Mertens (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-5497812) filed by London McDaniels. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pjh, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McDaniels v. Mertens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nicholas Mertens | |
| Represented By: | Jorge A. Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: London McDaniels | |
| Represented By: | Edward E. Kopko |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
