Muhammad v. Bank of International Settlement et al
Jamil Abdul Muhammad |
Bank of International Settlement, Agustin Carstens and Peter Zollmer |
3:2024cv00277 |
February 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
David N Hurd |
Miroslav Lovric |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER GRANTING DIRECT ASSIGNMENT; Pursuant to the Order of the Hon. David N. Hurd, USDJ, granting Direct Assignment. The cases are deemed related. So Ordered by Judge David N. Hurd on 2/28/2024. (ptm) |
TEXT Notice pursuant to General Order 12 of Potential Related Case(s), submitted to District Judge for review and determination. Potential Related cases: 3:24-cv-89, 3:24-cv-133, 3:24-cv-157, 3:24-cv-182, 3:24-cv-197, 3:24-cv-208, 3:24-cv-251. (khr) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE issued and explained to Jamil Abdul Muhammad at time complaint was filed on 2/26/2024. (khr) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jamil Abdul Muhammad (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) Motions referred to Miroslav Lovric. (khr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Bank of International Settlement, Agustin Carstens, Peter Zollmer filed by Jamil Abdul Muhammad. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1 - 3, #2 Exhibit 4, #3 Exhibits 5 - 18, #4 Exhibit 19, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(khr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.