Croizer et al v. Town of Woodstock et al
| Tiffany Croizer, Gabrielle Lalima and Michelle Sullivan |
| Town of Woodstock, Town of Woodstock Police Department, Clayton Keefe and Phillip Sinagra |
| 3:2024cv00427 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Miroslav Lovric |
| Frederick J Scullin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 7/31/2024 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 7/24/2024. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (khr) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Town of Woodstock. (Attachments: #1 Summons issued as to Town of Woodstock Police Department, #2 Summons issued as to Clayton Keefe, #3 Summons issued as to Phillip Sinagra)(khr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Clayton Keefe, Phillip Sinagra, Town of Woodstock, Town of Woodstock Police Department (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANYNDC-6672653) filed by Tiffany Croizer, Gabrielle Lalima, Michelle Sullivan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(khr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
