Selective Insurance Company of America v. Bartles Pharmacy, Inc.
Selective Insurance Company of America |
Bartles Pharamacy, Inc |
3:2024cv00558 |
April 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Miroslav Lovric |
Brenda K Sannes |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADMISSION REQUIREMENT as to Party: Selective Insurance Company of America; Attorney Nicholas Cramb, Email address is ncramb@mintz.com.. Admissions due by 5/7/2024. Case Assignment Clerk served a copy of G.O. 25 and Notice of Admission Requirement to attorney via email on 4/23/2024. (sbb) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference set for 8/28/2024 at 10:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 8/21/2024. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (sbb) |
TEXT NOTICE: The Initial Conference set for 8/28/2024 at 10:00AM before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric, will be held via Microsoft Teams Teleconferencing. The Courtroom Deputy will send a teams link to the parties to participate. (jdc ) |
TEXT NOTICE OF FILING DEFICIENCY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the following Filing Deficiency: Proposed Summons(es) were not included with the Complaint. Counsel is directed to file proposed summons(es) on the docket using the REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS(ES) event within 3 days of this notice. Notice of Filing Deficiency Deadline 4/26/2024 (sbb) |
Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Selective Insurance Company of America identifying Corporate Parent Selective Insurance Group, Inc., Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group for Selective Insurance Company of America. (sbb, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bartles Pharamacy, Inc (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANYNDC-6705551) filed by Selective Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- Selective Policy, #3 Exhibit C - Selective Policy, #4 Exhibit D - Selective Policy, #5 Exhibit E - Selective Policy, #6 Exhibit F - Decision, #7 Exhibit G - Supplemental CPL, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(sbb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Selective Insurance Company of America v. Bartles Pharmacy, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Selective Insurance Company of America | |
Represented By: | Kaitlyn Leonard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bartles Pharamacy, Inc | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.