Alexander et al v. Bahou et al

Alexander et al v. Bahou et al

Case Number:	5:1978cv00392
Filed:	January 12, 2021
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Syracuse Office
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 12, 2021	Filing 70 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER: that the government's 49 Motion to Modify the Consent Decree under Rule 60(b)(5) is Granted in Part; Paragraph 1(a) of the consent decree shall now read: The City shall have the right, to the extent necessary to meet its obligations and goals under this decree, to grant priority to African Americans and females who have successfully passed the applicable civil service examinations, which preference will operate in a matter analogous, but not identical, to t he priority which has been given to City residents over non-resident applicants (as more particularly set forth in paragraph 7). Nothing in this consent decree, including the allowances of hiring preferences in this Paragraph, Paragraph 7, and Parag raph 8(b), shall be construed as insulating the City from a civil suit for applying differing cutoff scores for the civil service examination on the basis of race or gender, including for African American and female applicants and that the government's motion is Denied in all other respects.Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 01/12/2021. (hmr)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 12, 2021

Filing 70 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER: that the government's 49 Motion to Modify the Consent Decree under Rule 60(b)(5) is Granted in Part; Paragraph 1(a) of the consent decree shall now read: The City shall have the right, to the extent necessary to meet its obligations and goals under this decree, to grant priority to African Americans and females who have successfully passed the applicable civil service examinations, which preference will operate in a matter analogous, but not identical, to t he priority which has been given to City residents over non-resident applicants (as more particularly set forth in paragraph 7). Nothing in this consent decree, including the allowances of hiring preferences in this Paragraph, Paragraph 7, and Parag raph 8(b), shall be construed as insulating the City from a civil suit for applying differing cutoff scores for the civil service examination on the basis of race or gender, including for African American and female applicants and that the government's motion is Denied in all other respects.Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 01/12/2021. (hmr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alexander et al v. Bahou et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?