Maxwell v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 5:2005cv00817
Filed: June 30, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Syracuse Office
Presiding Judge: Gustave J. DiBianco
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 70 JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT: This action is hereby dismissed in its entirety without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 68.2(a). The parties may request reinstatement of this case within 60 days if the settlement is not consummated, otherwise the dismissal will become with prejudice thereafter. The # 69 Letter Request/Motion is terminated as moot. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 1/25/2010. (jmb)
September 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER denying Defendant's # 39 Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying as moot Plaintiff's # 53 Motion to Strike the testimony of Dr. Richard M. Fiese, DMD from the administrative record. Counsel are directed to contact Judge Suddaby's courtroom deputy by 9/15/09 to schedule a prompt bench trial in this matter. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 9/1/09. (lmw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maxwell v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?