Swanson v. Barnhart
Case Number: 5:2006cv00097
Filed: January 24, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Syracuse Office
Presiding Judge: Gustave J. DiBianco
Presiding Judge: Frederick J. Scullin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEY FEES: in favor of Vicki J. Swanson against Michael J. Astrue pursuant to EAJA in the amount of $7,500.00, payable to Legal Services of Central New York. (jmb)
May 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 JUDGMENT: in favor of Vicki J. Swanson against Michael J. Astrue. (jmb)
May 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER: It is ordered that the # 12 Report and Recommendation and the Objections filed thereafter have been considered and the Court rules that the Commissioner's decision is VACATED and the # 1 Complaint is REMANDED to the Agency, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for a hearing to reconsider Plaintiff's disability claim. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 5/13/09. (jmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Swanson v. Barnhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?