Ragland v. U.S. Congress et al
| Kim Ragland |
| U.S. Congress, New York State Legislatures, Alberto Gonzales, Eliot Spitzer, Andrew Cuomo and App. Division Justices |
| 5:2007cv00718 |
| July 9, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Cayuga |
| George H. Lowe |
| Frederick J. Scullin |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: Dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Served by regular mail on plaintiff and US Atty.) Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 2/6/2008. (dmf)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER - on August 17, 2007, the plaintiff wrote a letter to the undersigned seeking to amend the Complaint, 8 Letter; unfortunately the letter was not docketed until after the Court dismissed plaintiff's complaint; this case has been referred back to me to VACATE re 7 Judgment, and REOPEN this case. The plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Order to file and Amended Complaint. The Amendment proposed in Plaintiff's August 17, 2007, letter is insufficient. Amended Pleadings due by 11/5/2007. Case Review Deadline 12/5/2007. Signed by Judge George H. Lowe on 10/4/07. Plaintiff served via USPS.(mnm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
