Dzwonczyk v. Syracuse Housing Authority et al
| Wlodzimierz J. Dzwonczyk |
| Syracuse Housing Authority, William J. Simmons, Joann Smith and Nicholas A. Napolitano |
| 5:2007cv01239 |
| November 27, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Onondaga |
| Norman A. Mordue |
| David E. Peebles |
| Civil Rights: Accomodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Syracuse Housing Authority, Joann Smith, Nicholas A. Napolitano, and William J. Simmons against Wlodzimierz J. Dzwonczyk. {Copy served upon pro se Plaintiff electronically and by regular mail} (mae)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of a letter dated 7/24/09 from plaintiff requesting a settlement conference, however this action is and remains closed until such time as plaintiff requests that it be reopened and certifies to the court that he is full y able to participate in the litigation process. Since it appears from his letter that plaintiff currently resides in Poland, he is unable to meet this requirement. The Court will take no action regarding this letter until such time as the case is reopened. The Court Clerk is directed to file and docket plaintiff's letter dated 7/24/09. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 7/31/09. {Copy mailed to plaintiff in Poland by regular mail} (jmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
