Guerra v. Jones et al
| Domingo P. Guerra |
| Stephen C. Jones, Daniel Lowengard, Ann Sanzone, Joan O'Shea, Colleen Brennon, Nancy Zarach, Barbara Warren, Ned Deuel, Laurie Menkin, Calvin Corriders, Cynthia Kirby, Dorothy Matthews, Nancy McCarty, Kim Rohadfax-Ceaser and John Does |
| 5:2008cv00028 |
| January 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Onondaga |
| George H. Lowe |
| Neal P. McCurn |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
JUDGMENT: in favor of Ann Sanzone, Barbara Warren, Calvin Corriders, Colleen Brennon, Cynthia Kirby, Daniel Lowengard, Dorothy Matthews, Joan O'Shea, John Does, Kim Rohadfax-Ceaser, Laurie Menkin, Nancy McCarty, Nancy Zarach, Ned Deuel, Stephen C. Jones against Domingo P. Guerra. {Copy served upon plaintiff by regular mail} (jmb)
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiff's 2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 3 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. RECOMMENDED that,should Plaintiff not pay the Court's $350.00 filing fee i n full within thirty days of the filing date of this order, this action be DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due by 2/20/2008 Case Review Deadline 2/25/2008. (Served by regular mail on non elect. party) Signed by Magistrate Judge George H. Lowe on 2/5/08. (dmf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
