City of Oneida, New York v. Kempthorne et al
| City of Oneida, New York |
| Dirk Kempthorne, P. Lynn Scarlett, James E. Cason and Franklin Keel |
| 5:2008cv00648 |
| June 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Madison |
| Gustave J. DiBianco |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that the Record of Decision issued on May 20, 2008 for the Oneida Indian Nation of New York Fee-to-Trust Request is REMANDED to the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Department of the Interior for further proceedings a nd it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 45) for summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice, with leave to re-file following further proceedings of DOI consistent with this Memorandum-Decision and Order. If Defendants choose to re-file, they must do so within thirty (30) days of the entry of an amended Record of Decision by DOI. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 24, 2012. (sas)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for partial dismissal (Dkt. No. 14) is GRANTED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 21, 2009. (sas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
