OptiGen, LLC v. International Genetics, Inc. et al
OptiGen, LLC |
International Genetics, Inc., Genetic Fulfillment USA, LLC, Pinpoint DNA Technologies, Inc. and Richard B. Dobbins |
5:2009cv00006 |
January 5, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Patent Office |
Tompkins |
Gustave J. DiBianco |
Glenn T. Suddaby |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
35:145 Patent Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 266 CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of Optigen, LLC against Defendants International Genetics, Inc., Genetic Fulfillment USA, LLC, PinPoint DNA Technologies, Inc. and Richard B. Dobbins permanently enjoining the defendants from all activity, including making, using, offering to sell and/or selling, any product or service in the countries or territories where OptiGen has patented protection for the inventions involving the patents listed herein. (lmw) |
Filing 218 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying defts' 211 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part pltf's 193 Motion for partial Summary Judgment. Counsel are directed to appear on 8/1/12 at 2:00 p.m. for a pretrial conference. Pltf is further directed to forward a written settlement demand to defts no later than 7/20/12. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 6/29/12. (cbm ) |
Filing 181 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER: GRANTING Plaintiff's # 162 / 166 motion to amend its Complaint and directing Plaintiff to file its amended complaint by 3/21/2011; GRANTING Plaintiff's # 13 motion to dismiss Defendants' 1st, 4th, and 5th Counterclaims and to strike Defendants' 5th and 6th affirmative defenses; and GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendant InGen's # 116 motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/8/2011. (mae) |
Filing 143 DECISION AND ORDER - OptiGens cross-motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f) No. 130 is granted, in that InGens motion for summary judgment 116 will beheld in abeyance pending the completion of discovery on July 30, 2010. OptiGen is granted leave to fi le a supplemental response to InGens summary judgment motion by August 30, 2010. InGen is granted leave to file a further reply with respect to its summary judgement motion by September 15, 2010. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 4/16/10. (mnm) |
Filing 111 CONSENT JUDGMENT: in favor of OptiGen, LLC against Texas A&M University System, and Dr. Ernest Gus Cothran. Texas A&M and its employees, including but not limited to Dr. Ernest Gus Cothran shall be permanently enjoined from all activity that constitu tes practicing the inventions contained in the following patents: U.S. Patent No. 5,804,388, U.S. Patent No. 6,201,114, U.S. Patent No. 6,210,897, U.S. Patent No. 6,428,958, U.S. Patent No. 7,312,037, Texas A&M shall be permanently enjoined from all activity that constitutes practicing the inventions for commercial purposes of the invention contained in U.S. Patent No. 7,285,388. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of this Consent Judgment. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/6/2010. (jmb) {Copy served upon Dr. Cothran by regular mail} |
Filing 38 ORDER granting the # 33 Motion to Consolidate Cases. It is Ordered that Case 5:09-cv-457 and 5:09-cv-6 are consolidated for all purposes and will remain assigned to District Judge Suddaby and Magistrate Judge DiBianco with Case 5:09-cv-6 designated as the LEAD CASE. Further Ordered that all future papers are to be docketed in Lead Case 5:09-cv-6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gustave J. DiBianco on 6/18/2009. (mae) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.