Danford v. City of Syracuse
Plaintiff: Willie Danford
Defendant: City of Syracuse
Case Number: 5:2009cv00307
Filed: March 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Onondaga
Presiding Judge: Gustave J. DiBianco
Presiding Judge: Glenn T. Suddaby
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER granting # 18 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing Plaintiff's amended complaint. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 09/12/12. (lmw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Danford v. City of Syracuse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Syracuse
Represented By: Joseph R.H. Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Danford
Represented By: Gilles R. Abitbol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?