OptiGen, LLC v. Texas A&M University System et al
Plaintiff: OptiGen, LLC
Defendant: Texas A&M University System, DNA Diagnostics, Inc., Melba S. Ketchum, International Genetics, Inc., Genetic Fulfillment USA, LLC, Pinpoint DNA Technologies, Inc. and Richard B. Dobbins
Case Number: 5:2009cv00457
Filed: April 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Patent Office
County: Tompkins
Presiding Judge: Gustave J. DiBianco
Presiding Judge: Glenn T. Suddaby
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:145 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 36 CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of Optigen, LLC against Defendants International Genetics, Inc., Genetic Fulfillment USA, LLC, PinPoint DNA Technologies, Inc. and Richard B. Dobbins permanently enjoining the defendants from all activity, including making, using, offering to sell and/or selling, any product or service in the countries or territories where OptiGen has patented protection for the inventions involving the patents listed herein. (lmw )
February 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 CONSENT JUDGMENT: in favor of OptiGen, LLC against Texas A&M University System, and Dr. Ernest Gus Cothran. Texas A&M and its employees, including but not limited to Dr. Ernest Gus Cothran shall be permanently enjoined from all activity that constitu tes practicing the inventions contained in the following patents: U.S. Patent No. 5,804,388, U.S. Patent No. 6,201,114, U.S. Patent No. 6,210,897, U.S. Patent No. 6,428,958, U.S. Patent No. 7,312,037, Texas A&M shall be permanently enjoined from all activity that constitutes practicing the inventions for commercial purposes of the invention contained in U.S. Patent No. 7,285,388. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of this Consent Judgment. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/6/2010. (jmb)
June 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting the # 19 Motion to Consolidate Cases. It is Ordered that Case 5:09-cv-457 and 5:09-cv-6 are consolidated for all purposes and will remain assigned to District Judge Suddaby and Magistrate Judge DiBianco with Case 5:09-cv-6 designated as the LEAD CASE. Further Ordered that all future papers are to be docketed in Lead Case 5:09-cv-6. No further docketing shall be done in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gustave J. DiBianco on 6/18/2009. (mae)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OptiGen, LLC v. Texas A&M University System et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OptiGen, LLC
Represented By: Robert J. Lane, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Texas A&M University System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DNA Diagnostics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melba S. Ketchum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: International Genetics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Genetic Fulfillment USA, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pinpoint DNA Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard B. Dobbins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?