McMahon v. Officer Carns et al
| Sean E. McMahon |
| Officer Carns, Brendan Cope, Officer Fura, Officer Novitsky, Officer Patti, Officer Summers, Officer Tassini and City of Syracuse |
| 5:2010cv01063 |
| September 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Onondaga |
| George H. Lowe |
| Norman A. Mordue |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
JUDGMENT in favor of City of Syracuse, Officer Fura against Sean E. McMahon. (cbm )
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that defendants' # 33 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as specifically stated herein. The surviving claims against the City of Syracuse and Officer Fura will proceed to trial. Further ORDERED that a telephone conference is to be scheduled at the earliest possible convenience to schedule a trial date. Signed by Magistrate Judge George H. Lowe on 12/22/2011. {Officer Patti and Officer Summers terminated as of 12/23/2011} (mae)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: Defendants' # 19 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED, except that the claims against Defendants Carns, Cope, Novitsky and Tassini are DISMISSED in their entirety with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 5/17/2011. (mae)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
