Stephenson Equipment, Inc. v. ATS Specialized, Inc. et al
Stephenson Equipment, Inc. |
ATS Specialized, Inc. and ATS Trucking Service, Inc. |
5:2010cv01517 |
December 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Syracuse Office |
Onondaga |
George H. Lowe |
Glenn T. Suddaby |
Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER denying # 23 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying # 26 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 8/23/13. Counsel are directed to appear on SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. in chambers for a pretrial conference, at which counsel are directed to appear with settlement authority, and in the event that the case does not settle, trial will be scheduled at that time. Plaintiff is further directed to forwa rd a written settlement demand to defendants no later than SEPTEMBER 13, 2013, and the parties are directed to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations prior to the 9/30/13 conference. In the event that counsel feel settlement is unlikely, counsel may request to participate via telephone conference for the limited purpose of scheduling a trial date by electronically filing a letter request at least one week prior to the scheduled conference. (lmw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.