Solomon v. Human Services Coalition of Tompkins County, Inc. et al
| Saraiya Solomon |
| Lee Dillon, Christine Barksdale, James A. Brown, Patricia Carey, Susan Dale-Hall, David G. Evelyn, Jim Hull, John T. Lemley, Saoirse McClory, Deborah Mohlenhoff, Shawn Martel Moore, Ron Provus, Lenore Schwager, Human Services Coalition of Tompkins County, Inc., Jim Dennis, Sarah Johnson, Philip Snyder, Cal Walker, Nancy Zahler, M. Kathlen Schlather, Edward Swayze, Francine Spadafora-Manzella and City Federation of Women's Organization of Ithaca New York Inc. |
| 5:2011cv00226 |
| February 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Tompkins |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
JUDGMENT in favor of City Federation of Women's Organization of Ithaca New York Inc., Human Services Coalition of Tompkins County, Inc., Cal Walker, Christine Barksdale, David G. Evelyn, Deborah Mohlenhoff, Edward Swayze, Francine Spadafora-Man zella, James A. Brown, Jim Dennis, Jim Hull, John T. Lemley, Lee Dillon, Lenore Schwager, M. Kathlen Schlather, Nancy Zahler, Patricia Carey, Philip Snyder, Ron Provus, Saoirse McClory, Sarah Johnson, Shawn Martel Moore, Susan Dale-Hall against Saraiya Solomon. (lmw, )
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER: It is ORDERED that the # 4 Report-Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; the claims asserted in Plaintiff's 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th, 10th, 11th and 12th causes of action are DISMISSED with prejud ice to the extent that they are premised on a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241 and/or 18 U.S.C. § 245, or are asserted on behalf of a third party; that currently remaining in this case are Plaintiff's 1st, 6th, 8th, 9th and 13th causes of action in their entirety, and those claims asserted in her 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th, 10th, 11th and 12th causes of action that are not premised on a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241 and/or 18 U.S.C. § 245. Further ORDERED that Plaintiff complet e a separate summons and USM-285 form for each Defendant, and return them to the Clerk's office, with 23 copies of her complaint. Upon receipt of said documents the Clerk shall schedule a Rule 16 conference, issue summonses and forward them, wit h copies of the Complaint and General Order 25 packet to the U. S. Marshal for service upon the named Defendants. Subsequent to service Defendants are to file a formal response to the surviving claims in Plaintiffs Complaint. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 5/27/2011. {Copy of Order, 23 summonses, 23 USM-285 forms sent to pro se Plaintiff by regular mail} (mae)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
