Dziedzic v. The State University of New York at Oswego et al
Plaintiff: Michele Dziedzic
Defendant: Michael J. Izyk, Marta Santiago, The State University of New York at Oswego and Mary K. DePentu
Case Number: 5:2011cv00743
Filed: June 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Syracuse Office
County: Onondaga
Presiding Judge: David N. Hurd
Presiding Judge: George H. Lowe
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Clery Act claim against Defendant is DISMISSED sua sponte, because the Clery Act does not provide for private causes of action. The Court further ORDERS that Defendant's motion for summa ry judgment (located in lead case 5:10-CV-1018) is GRANTED with respect to the claims that appeared in Plaintiff's first DHR Complaint because they are untimely. The Court further ORDERS that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (located in lead case 5:10-CV-1018) is GRANTED with regard to Plaintiff's remaining discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment claims. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular and certified mail, return receipt requested. ] (nmk)
July 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part defts' Motion in the lead case to Dismiss complaint in 5:11-cv-743, or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement. Pltf's Human Rights Law claim is DISMISSED in its entirety. Defts Marta Santiago, Mary DePentu and Michael Izyk are DISMISSED as defts in 5:11-cv-743. The pltf may file an amended complaint w/in 30 days of the date of this MDO. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 7/6/12. (cbm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dziedzic v. The State University of New York at Oswego et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Izyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marta Santiago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The State University of New York at Oswego
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary K. DePentu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michele Dziedzic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?